Oooops, first I started writing this off-list, then I changed my mind but
forgot about the subject-change... =(
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 the voices made Tony L. Svanstrom write:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 the voices made Marc Perkel write:
>
> > Yes they are!! I didn't solicit the Yahoo ad. ADVERTISING = SPAM. But
> > you still missed my POINT so you should read my message and quit arguing
> > values.
>
> (I don't want to add to the noice on the list any longer, just one last
> comment and then I'm done with this.)
>
> Advertising is _not_ the same as spam, unwanted advertising is not the same as
> spam; spam is by definition unsolicited bulk _e-mails_; an e-mail with an ad in
> it is just that, an e-mail with an ad in it.
>
> Yes, advertising and spam usually try to do the exact same thing, which is to
> sell something, meaning that a lot of phrases in spam and advertising are the
> same; which means that the rules used by SA must be designed so that either a)
> the common phrases are avoided, or b) so that there are rules with negative
> scores that cancle out the postive score in non-spam advertising.
>
> RULES ARE MEANT TO HIT ON SPAM, NOT ON ANY AND ALL ADVERTISING!!!
>
>
> /Tony
>
/Tony
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= #
perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -source svanstrom.com/t`'
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
