Smarter spammers who are trying to avoid Postini etc. will also 
be smarter at avoiding our filters.

C

On Thursday, July 18, 2002, at 09:56  AM, Martin Nile wrote:

> However it seems that a higher percentage of SPAM that slips in beneath
> spamassassin came in via the secondary MX.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to