Moving this back to SA talk where it belongs.

I'd be very concerned that you might running mails through SA multiple 
times and not just once, particularly with your comments about 
SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK. I think it's being run through SA once, being marked as 
spam, defanged, then sometime later being run through SA a second time, and 
not scoring as high because the mime has been defanged. It would appear 
that the second SA run is clobbering the headers added by the first one.



At 10:30 AM 7/16/2002 -0700, Dale wrote:

>On this last example, the subject gets tagged with SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK, but
>that is only added by SpamAssassin.  I don't think that should count in
>the hit tally.  As a work around, I have removed the ? from local.cf
>for now.  Would upgrading to 2.40CVS fix my problems or is there
>another fix available.
>
>Thanks, and have a nice day.
>
>-Dale
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
>http://autos.yahoo.com
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
>real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
>http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
>_______________________________________________
>Spamassassin-devel mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to