I think what Julian is saying and I recall see the same thing with Mailscanner before he's temp fix is that if you called is_spam() using the same message, that it will give the same scoring but is_spam() would return true.
-----Original Message----- From: Geoff Gibbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bug report: -2.7 > 9 ??? Julian Field writes: > Run the command > ./spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > and I get this at the end of the output > > SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results > ---------------------- > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. > SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > SPAM: > SPAM: Content analysis details: (-2.7 hits, 9 required) > So -2.7 > 9 is it? No, you are running in test mode so that it puts out the results. The results contain the phrase 'This mail is probably spam.', but you are testing the nonspam sample and the result is -2.7 so it is ok (?) Geoff UK-Human Genome Mapping Project-Resource Centre, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SB, UK Tel: +44 1223 494530 Fax: +44 1223 494512 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
