Vivek Khera wrote: >>>>>>"BS" == Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> > > BS> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote: > >>>The problem is it doesn't work at all >> > > BS> It worked, but only for messages that actually did mention ebay in the > BS> headers somewhere. For completely unrelated messages it was broken. > > Which really underscores the need to have both postive *and* negative > tests for each rule like that.
Actually "make test" did fail because of the brokenness I checked in. What it really underlies is that you should never trust a CVS build ;-) The big problem now is we need to have a better way to test eval type rules, as at the moment it's hard to specify an email for these rules. I'll certainly be looking into it though. Matt. ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
