On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Ollie Acheson wrote: > Shortly after I upgraded to 2.30, I got the following spam which, as > you can see, received a negative score. I don't understand why, since > neither the from nor the to are in my whitelist. > > Is this a bug?
It's not strictly a bug, it's just the way the scoring algorithm computed new scores this time. > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 > > tests=X_NOT_PRESENT,NO_REAL_NAME,PLING_PLING,PLING > > version=2.30 Two of the rule score changes since 2.21: score: NO_REAL_NAME 0.632 -> -1.068 score: X_NOT_PRESENT 0.500 -> -1.920 A message that short probably wouldn't have scored above 5.0 anyway, but those two rules appear not to be very useful. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
