On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:37:38PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > The tricky part is that frequently between releases new rules get built which > depend on new library features -- so CVS rules won't necessarily work on > anything but CVS libs. Certainly at least EvalTests.pm would need to be in the > "rules update" distro, but probably also other stuff from time to time. And you > basically end up running into stability vs. regularity of updates. The way > we've tried to solve this historically has been with a policy of keeping things > as stable as possible, and releasing fairly often; quickly enough that the > rules/scores don't get too far out of date. It's now been quite a while since > our last release, and so I'm going to do the 2.30 release imminently. I will > post a separate thread message with the usual freeze request plus requests for > nonspam.log submissions.
Would it not be easier to simply release the non-eval rules. Sure, scores wouldn't be ideal. But hey, that's the price you pay :-) -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
