[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [Slaughtered Subject line ALERT: Not sure what this belongs under,
> it showed up on my system sort of buggered up]
>
> Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> STDOUT. If you specify -D and -d together, then spamd should
> >> definitely install
> >> a $SIG{__WARN__} handler which redirects to its logmsg() function.
> >> Actually, it
> >> should do this if you use -d whether or not you use -D.
>
> I don't think it does though. All I see with both -d and -D engaged
> is ther logmsg output in /var/log/messages `clean message' or similar.
> None of the Debug output shows up. So I think logmsg does not handle
> debug output. Is this correct?
Yeah, by "should" I meant "should be made to do that" not that it's expected to
do that currently. Though the CVS code now is supposed to be doing that.
C
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
