On Fri, 24 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
> Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> > Would it be possible to set up an environment where you can test changed/new
> > rules against a set number of spam and non-spam, preferably the same ones used
> > for the current GA-scores?
>
> The best way is to just extract the header from emails you know break,
> and write tests for them. It's dead easy, just:
>
> test RULE_NAME ok Something this rule should match
> test RULE_NAME fail Something this rule should not match
>
> Unfortunately it doesn't cope with embedded newlines in headers yet, but
> I'm hoping that will become completely irrelevant once SA does proper
> email parsing.
I was thinking that it'd be a great help to get the GA-generated score as a
sign of if one's heading in the right direction; esp. helpful when you think
you might be able to improve an existing rule.
Yes, I'm slowly moving in the direction of maybe actually helping instead of
just asking stupid questions. =)
/Tony
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= #
-- Random URL (3/8):
<URL: http://www.slashdot.org/ > Who's getting ./:ed today?
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
