On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:23:27AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>     :0H
>     * ! ^X-Spam-Status:
>     {
>       :0fw
>       | spamc
>     }
> 
>     :0:spam.lock
>     * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
>     $SPAM
> 
> If I have a problem I sometimes can't easily tell where SA ran.  It would be
> nice if when run as a filter, SA added a Received: header to the message.
> It is, after all, a sort of MTA.  Is this possible?

Well, actually it's not an MTA...  But why don't you add a header yourself?  Something 
like:

:0fw
| spamc | formail -fa "X-SA-Scanned-On: `/usr/bin/hostname`"


-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Chile today.  Hot tamale.

_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to