On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:23:40PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: | dman wrote:
| d> This message was _not_ flagged by SA. Who would want to send it
| d> anyways? (all intact except for the Received: headers)
| Interesting.
yeah.
| Could be AWL flooding.
Nope. I don't use the AWL. It also didn't have any mention of the
AWL in the X-Spam-Status header and got a score of 3.2.
| Or is this just the text/plain part and
| there's also a text/html which had actual images in it?
No, I checked that before I posted it. Obviously it wouldn't be easy
to make rules to catch it, and that isn't necessary unless it becomes
a repeat offense :-).
Someone commented on it off-list :
It's stock-quote spam. Check out
http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~gcaselton/spam/stockmarket.html.
It's quite possible that they just screwed up their spam program
and sent out a messed up message. (Not like I've never seen them
send out bogus bogus messages before. Or how about three copies of
the same message? Yeah...)
-D
--
He who scorns instruction will pay for it,
but he who respects a command is rewarded.
Proverbs 13:13
GnuPG key : http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_key.gpg
msg04793/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
