On Sat, 04 May 2002, Kaitlin Duck Sherwood wrote:
> Craig said:
>>   > There's a lot of nonspam which uses I-M-G too, thing like Amazon
>>   > order confirmations, fancier newsletters, etc, etc.
> 
> Though those are easy to whitelist. Is the philosophy here to assume
> that the user isn't whitelisting? (<- That's not a hostile question, I
> just don't know.)

In my opinion -- and I am not a core developer here -- it should be.
Whitelisting should be a "nothing else works" solution, not an
assumption that everything is that way.

The main reason for this, of course, is that I use SpamAssassin because
I get five to ten times the volume of SPAM through mailing lists to
which I am subscribed that I do directly.

So, whitelisting any mailing list service is, for me, a loss overall.

        Daniel

-- 
My fate cannot be mastered; it can only be collaborated with
and thereby, to some extent, directed. Nor am I the captain
of my soul; I am only the noisiest passenger.
        -- Aldous Huxley

_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to