On Sat, 04 May 2002, Kaitlin Duck Sherwood wrote: > Craig said: >> > There's a lot of nonspam which uses I-M-G too, thing like Amazon >> > order confirmations, fancier newsletters, etc, etc. > > Though those are easy to whitelist. Is the philosophy here to assume > that the user isn't whitelisting? (<- That's not a hostile question, I > just don't know.)
In my opinion -- and I am not a core developer here -- it should be. Whitelisting should be a "nothing else works" solution, not an assumption that everything is that way. The main reason for this, of course, is that I use SpamAssassin because I get five to ten times the volume of SPAM through mailing lists to which I am subscribed that I do directly. So, whitelisting any mailing list service is, for me, a loss overall. Daniel -- My fate cannot be mastered; it can only be collaborated with and thereby, to some extent, directed. Nor am I the captain of my soul; I am only the noisiest passenger. -- Aldous Huxley _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk