Charlie Watts wrote: CW> The messages, once passed through SA, should have an X-Spam-Status header CW> that lists the SA tests that were caught. CW> CW> If that header isn't there, the messages aren't going through SA. CW> CW> Is that header there-but-different on the working/non-working accounts, or CW> is it *missing* on the non-working accounts? If it is missing, the CW> messages aren't going through SA.
Well, depends what you mean by "going through SA". The messages *could* be going through spamc, if spamc is failing to communicate with spamd. In that case, there will be no X-Spam-Status headers. C _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
