On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig R Hughes write: > Rob McMillin wrote: > > RM> His approach is good but inadequate already. The "European Girls" spam > RM> includes random data to evade just such tests. I wonder if he has a way > RM> around this? > > Yes, he does. Read in the razor archives about "ephemeral hashes". I think his
<URL: http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:qa7v1sghG_sC:www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/2539/0/8009113/+%22ephemeral+hashes%22&hl=eng > > bigger problem will be convincing people who don't have their own local servers > to use razor (unreliable as it's been known to be), since he seems to be > planning to charge for the server piece. Good luck to him anyway, I think > there's certainly a lot of room to go against some of the generation 1 products > like BrightMail and win. > > C > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > /Tony -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! | | Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk