On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig R Hughes write:

> Rob McMillin wrote:
>
> RM> His approach is good but inadequate already. The "European Girls" spam
> RM> includes random data to evade just such tests. I wonder if he has a way
> RM> around this?
>
> Yes, he does.  Read in the razor archives about "ephemeral hashes".  I think his

 <URL: 
http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:qa7v1sghG_sC:www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/2539/0/8009113/+%22ephemeral+hashes%22&hl=eng
 >

> bigger problem will be convincing people who don't have their own local servers
> to use razor (unreliable as it's been known to be), since he seems to be
> planning to charge for the server piece.  Good luck to him anyway, I think
> there's certainly a lot of room to go against some of the generation 1 products
> like BrightMail and win.
>
> C
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>


        /Tony
-- 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! |
 | Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= |
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to