> I can't speak for Craig, but I'm sure a patch to implement adding spam > reports by MIME-mangling would be considered.
Depending on what Rick manages to get done, maybe I'll look into doing this over the weekend. > Everyone pretty much agrees that SpamAssassin does one thing, and does > it well: inspect an email message and decide if it's spam. What to do > next is up to you. Every site is different. Hmm. Good point. Maybe all I want/need is an option to have SpamAssassin spit out the report and let me deal with it externally. 'spamc -c' comes close, but I'm still missing the report if I do that. Maybe a 'spamc -C' would be in order. Then, I can MIME-mangle and spam-bounce all I'd like. > *None* of my false positives have been mail that would be worth > responding to so that some stranger who happens to be on the same > mailing list as me can send me mail. But that's just my experience. It's a bit different for me; I frequently deal with pretty clueless e-mails for various reasons, and my experience in the past is that a number of them are almost indistinguishable from spam. :) -jim _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
