On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote: > 2. Single message from infrequent correspondant scores very high or very > low. Let's say I send you a message which for some reason gets a -100 > bonus (badly constructed whitelist_from or something). Ok, now I'm in > the AWL2 db as (-100,1).
Ooh, ick. I'd suggest that the scores recorded in the AWL never include values derived from explicit whitelist/blacklist rules. If I delete an address from the whitelist in user_prefs, that should be that -- SA should not be remembering for all time that I *used to* have that address on the whitelist. I realize that implementing the above might be a lot more complicated than saying it. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
