Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:26:42PM +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
>>I think the original intention of the count was to make sure we had at
>>least three upper case chars, in which case you could get away with:
>>
>>/^([A-Z]|[^a-z])*?[A-Z]{3,}([A-Z]|[^a-z])*$/
>>
>>That needs testing though to make sure it doesn't backtrack horribly (I
>>don't think it will, but I could be wrong).
>>
>
>Why not simplify this a little bit?
>
>/^[^a-z]*?[A-Z]{3}[^a-z]*$/
>
Yeah, I like this, too. If it wasn't for you meddling kids, MY change
would be in the distribution! :-)
--
http://www.pricegrabber.com | Dog is my co-pilot.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
