On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Craig Hughes wrote: > Yes, that might be a little high
I would suggest that we be extremely careful about checks that get given a score over 5. Part of the beauty of SpamAssassin (and heuristics in general) is that usually a hit just contributes to the overall score, but doesn't necessarily tip things over. Having said that, some things almost inevitably should be over 5, like ratware. > On 3/6/02 7:43 PM, "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I should probably whitelist the spamcop mails, but it seems like a score of > > 5.8 for /Mortgage rates/i is a bit excessive. > -- Matt. <:->get a SMart net</:-> ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
