On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Matthew Cline wrote:
> On Thursday 07 March 2002 02:53 am, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>> > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
>> > > Yep, I'm seeing this stuff too (though not in huge numbers yet).
>> > > I'm going to examine the body rules in a bit more detail, and if
>> > > it makes sense, to basically remove all punctuation chars
>> > > (everything except whitespace and letters/numbers) from the body
>> > > tests.
>
>> > I've been wondering about just adding a test that looks for oddly
>> > placed punctuation in the midst of words. Something like the
>> > GAPPY_TEXT rule, except that it'd match even if there were only one
>> > or two "misplaced" punctuations but require that there be several
>> > such words (not necessarily consecutive).
>
>> The trouble with that is it sounds like it might hit false positives
>> quite highly. You'd have to have some sort of second test like
>> LINE_OF_YELLING does that checks how many times it got hit.
>
> Alright, here's a first pass at it:
>
> -----
>
> body DOT_HIDING eval:check_for_dot_hiding()
> describe DOT_HIDING Might try to hide phrases with dots
+ if (structure.value == 2)
+ {
+ structure.value2++;
+ structure.value -= structure.value2;
+ }
> score DOT_HIDING 1.0
...should match for a total of five points toward this email with a
patch being SPAM.
Daniel
--
The revolution WILL be televised, but you'll only be able to
understand it if you don't watch the television coverage.
-- Russ Nelson
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
