Hmmm, well if you do then here will will have to turn that test off first thing. We are an international company with distributors or offices in at least 4 of those domains.
-- Kent Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Manager - Systems Admin & Networking Hunter Engineering Company > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Doty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 15:51 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Proposed "FROM_SPAMLAND" user response summary (was > Re: [SAtalk] A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD > > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:50:03PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote regarding > the "FROM_SPAMLAND" test: > ] http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/11679/350/7984404/ > > > /\.(?:kr|cn|cl|ar|hk|il|th|tw|sg|za|tr|ma|ua|in|pe)(?:[\s\)\]]|$)/ > > Let the spear-chucking commence! > > I took this suggestion to our local antispam list, and > solicited user input. > The following is a summary of responses... > > For: 5 > Against: 1 > > One lady belongs to an amateur radio discussion group, and > was against the > test, as it would block a goodly chunk of mail from the list. > One of the > gentlemen for the test pointed out that he had recently > conversed with a > group of folks using one of these tld's, giving them some Linux help > off-list. Nevertheless, he was for the test, as long as the > default score > was 0. > > Those for the test suggested modifications: > > * Default score = 0 > * Separate tests for each tld (so that score for each tld can > be controlled) > * "They should add russion .ru to this list." > > One notable comment follows: > > YES! When it comes to nuking spam, I say "Screw > 'politically correct' > with a nail-studded baseball bat doused in battery acid. > JUST DO IT!" > Personally, if such a test gets added, I will, IMMEDIATELY after > learning about it, add a "score FROM_SPAMLAND 1000.0" line > to my prefs > to absolutely guarantee I never hear from them again. . . > > Not once in my 'net life have I seen a non-spam message > from ANY of the > domains showing in the test as listed in your post. "Kill > 'em all and let > /dev/null sort 'em out!", sez I. > > While most people were not as vociferous in their support of > the test, the > message seems to be that some inspection of tld's would be > appreciated. > > -Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk >
smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature
