On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:28:20AM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote:
> There's some body tests that would also work for the subject, like the 
> CASHCASHCASH test, and I've seen some spam were the tests didn't match the 
> body but would have matched the subject.  Would it be worth it to make a 
> body_subject test which would add the subject to the body before running the 
> test?  Or should separate subject rules be made for these?  Or would it not 
> be worth it, period?

I'd agree with this.  Maybe a body/subject test?  One that I've seen
recently was mentioning Viagra in the subject, but only talking about their
'online pharmacy' in the body.

Dan.

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to