On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:27:21PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > While modifying the GA, I noticed that I'd run the scoring for 2.1 with a > population of only 20 -- normally I run with about 100 but had lowered it or > speed while doing some testing. The small population size almost certainly > had a major negative effect on the scores produced. I'm rerunning now with > the limits on individual scores mentioned before, plus the bigger population > size, and so far getting much, much better results in terms of number of > false identifications while staying within more same scoring limits for the > individual rules. >
I was thinking the statistics were somewhat disappointing :-) -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
