Access to the list of spams is somewhat restricted because it contains email addresses of spamtraps.
The nonspam archive doesn't exist as such -- each of the contributors to the nonspam side run mass-check on their own mails and submit the nonspam.log output. Really there are 2 effective ways of testing out new rules: 1. Look at the rule and see if it makes sense, also ask this list if others think it makes sense 2. Check the rule against your own personal spam and nonspam archives. No need to run mass-check, just "egrep -c" normally works pretty good. C On 2/28/02 12:11 AM, "Matthew Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have some ideas for additions to the filtering rules, but I'd like to test > their usefulness before sugesting them to the list. Ideally, I'd get the > mass-checking and GA programs, run them against the archive of spam and > non-spam messages that the official scores file is generated from, and see if > it improved things any. Is there any place to get these things? What other > ways are there of seeing if a new or modified rule is worth including? _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
