Until just about 5 minutes ago we were waiting on a GA run to rescore the rules. Now that's done, we're waiting on me to clear out my backlog of emails from people asking when the release will be. In other words, I'm planning on doing the release tonight (assuming justin's release scripts all work as expected).
C On 2/26/02 4:36 PM, "Duncan Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know we re-added all the extra libs to the Makefile, but I'm wondering if > this is the best way. On Debian sid, spamc builds/works fine without these > libs. I will release Debian without the extra libs. (Of course, we'll see > whether the autobuilders find missing dependencies....) > > Perhaps it depends on the version of libc? > > > Spamd and spamproxyd's manpages should probably be in section 8. I'm not > sure if this can be done with Perl's makefiles, but it would be nice. > Otherwise, I'm going to have to do this manually, by patching the man pages > and then installing them in the right place. (*sigh*) It may also be an > issue with section 8 not meaning system administrator stuff on other > platforms. > > > Would it be possible to release soon? (please!) I'd rather not package a cvs > version. What are we waiting on? _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
