On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 08:51:52AM -0500, Greg Ward wrote: > On 22 February 2002, Michael Moncur said: > > I think virtually any message sent as one big graphic would be spam, > > but I can't think of a good way to detect it using a regular > > expression. Perhaps you could look for <IMG...height= followed by a > > number greater than x (300?). > > I don't think a regex is the right tool to use here. SA has stretched > regex usage to impressive extremes, but it's *not* a Turing-complete > language! This should be implemented as an eval test. >
I disagree. An eval test here would be rather useless, as it could provide little more functionality than a regex, unless it actually attempted to download the image. -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
