EXACTLY the same experience.  Killing spamass-milter and restarting it and
things start working again. 


--
Kent Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Manager - Systems Admin & Networking
Hunter Engineering Company


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 5:59 PM
> To: Hamilton, Kent
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA with FreeBSD
> 
> 
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Hamilton, Kent wrote:
> 
> > Does anyone have spamassassin working on FreeBSD 4.x,
> > sendmail (8.12.2), with spamass-milter?
> >
> > I'm trying to filter for an entire network and have NOT
> > been able to get this working. I'll happily provide any
> > details, logs, etc.
> 
> Using same environment, I'm getting spamass-milter 'hanging' after
> processing a random number of messages ... if you kill 
> spamass-milter off
> and restart it, she continues on merrily ...
> 
> Is that your same experiences?  I'm running FreeBSd 
> 4.5-sTABLE from the
> other day here, so am reasonably up to date ...
> 
> 
> 
>  >
> > --
> > Kent Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Manager - Systems Admin & Networking
> > Hunter Engineering Company
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Woodworth, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 4:49 PM
> > > To: 'Sidney Markowitz'
> > > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with
> > > Qmail and Qmail s canner?
> > >
> > >
> > > DOH
> > >
> > > See what happens when a Unix newbie is doing installs  :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, I logged in as Qmailq, the user that runs the scanner,
> > > and spamc fails
> > > as him.  It kind of felt like a silly Unix thing this whole
> > > time but I'm
> > > glad somebody pointed it out to me.  Although, I should have
> > > been able to
> > > fix this one myself.  I hate dumb mistakes.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sidney Markowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 5:43 PM
> > > To: Woodworth, Eric
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with
> > > Qmail and Qmail
> > > s canner?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 13:41, Woodworth, Eric wrote:
> > > > I've removed the -f from where spamc gets called to force a fail
> > >
> > > The -f option has been deprecated, made the default, and is
> > > left in as a
> > > no-op for now to not break scripts from earlier installs. 
> I don't see
> > > anyway to tell spamc to lose mail if it fails.
> > >
> > > > I never get mail marked as spam, even if spamc will call it spam
> > > > when invoked from the command line
> > >
> > > What are the differences between running spamc from the
> > > command line and
> > > in the script? One might be the user that spamc is 
> running as and the
> > > differences in environment, home directory, and file 
> permissions that
> > > you and that user have. I don't use spamc that way... 
> Does it need the
> > > -u option to tell spamd who you are when it is invoked by a
> > > script that
> > > is not running as you?
> > >
> > >  -- sidney
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> >
> 

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to