On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:12:23AM -0600, Shane Williams wrote:
> | I was looking at the porn expressions and scoring, and thought of an
> | idea to shoot by everybody.
> |
> | If I'm reading the PORN_3 rule correctly,
>
> I had set all the PORN_* rules to 10.0 in my config. I kept getting a
> significant number of normal tech/geek messages triggering the PORN_3
> test, and a few triggered PORN_8 yesterday. I haven't gone through
> the rule itself, but I cut the score down on those 2 tests. I second
> the motion that the rule needs some improvement :-).
>
I don't remember which PORN_* score it was hitting, but I get a lot of
mail that has ip addresses x'd out. So it would hit on xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
and mark it as spam. Maybe the xxx stuff should get moved to a unique xxx
rule
James
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
