I'm seeing a few (not many) false positives with empty To: headers, mostly it's RFP's and things like that where everything goes in the BCC. I'm wondering if the To: checks aren't a bit over zealous, for example I get:
To: is empty To: has a malformed address Missing To: header All matching for every email with a blank To. I know I could just rescore this stuff (email in question scored 7.41, our threshold is set to 7), but it seems to me we should have just *one* test for an empty To address (and thus let the GA do its work), and have the other tests be simply based on To headers with *something* in it. I don't have any scores to back any of this up yet though. Any thoughts on this? -- Matt. <:->get a SMart net</:-> ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
