Ok, in theory I think I've applied the patch... Webmake should rebuild the site and deploy it in the next hour or so.
C On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 17:49, Jason Haar wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:29:17PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > > I think -F1 is the default, isn't it? Since you're probably more > > Err - duh. I meant "-F 0" :-) > > Sheezh, too many brain cells firing at once here! > > > > familiar with what such people might want to hear (I don't use that > > config, and am liable to misdocument things), want to knock something up > > and forward a patch? > > OK, it should go into http://spamassassin.org/sitewide.html > > > > -- > Cheers > > Jason Haar > > Information Security Manager > Trimble Navigation Ltd. > Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 > ---- > > *** sitewide.html.orig Tue Feb 5 14:40:53 2002 > --- public_html/sitewide.html Tue Feb 5 14:47:52 2002 > *************** > *** 130,141 **** > to reject, manipulate or otherwise mangle the message." > > </li> > </ol> > <p> > It's worth noting that the SpamAssassin also includes ><strong>spamd</strong>, a daemonized > version of SpamAssassin with a low-overhead C client, >contributed by Craig R. > Hughes. This greatly improves its suitability in >high-volume setups, by > ! massively increasing the message throughput. > > </p> > <p> > --- 130,144 ---- > to reject, manipulate or otherwise mangle the message." > > </li> > + <li> > + <a >href="http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/">Qmail-Scanner</a>, a Email content >filter that scans all e-mail messages sent through a <a >href="http://www.qmail.org/">Qmail</a> installation, and can block messages based on >a variety of methods such as presence of virii, specfic header content, attachments >and now SpamAssassin. > + </li> > </ol> > <p> > It's worth noting that the SpamAssassin also includes ><strong>spamd</strong>, a daemonized > version of SpamAssassin with a low-overhead C client, >contributed by Craig R. > Hughes. This greatly improves its suitability in >high-volume setups, by > ! massively increasing the message throughput. Remember, >when running SpamAssassin in such a site-wide configuration, it is almost 100% likely >you will want to run spamd with the "-F 0" option: i.e. stop SpamAssassin added a >"From " header. Without "-F 0", SpamAssassin will tend to <b>break</b> messages as >such systems will end up adding their own headers on top of the message - ruining the >End User Experience :-) > > </p> > <p> _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk