on 1/29/02 10:56 PM, Jason Haar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> "spamc -h" states:
> 
> Usage: spamc [-d host] [-p port] [-c] [-f] [-h]
> -c: check only - print score/threshold and exit code set to 0 if message is
> not spam, 1 if spam
> ...
> 
> That sounds like the addition of the feature request I made a couple of
> weeks ago - but it doesn't work :-(
> 
> Shouldn't "-c" report (e.g.) "11/5" and exit code "1" for a nasty piece of
> spam? It reports nothing on stdout...
> 
> Thanks anyway, the "-c" option will be officially supported in the next
> release of Qmail-Scanner either way :-)
> 
> BTW: I agree with the sentiment about virus scanners vs spam. In
> Qmail-Scanner, the SpamAssassin support merely tags the messages as spam -
> it doesn't quarantine them like it does for viruses. Still too many false
> alerts I'm afraid - a lot of my Email from root cronjobs gets caught! ;-)

Seems to be setting the exitcode code correctly for me when I try it just
now, but not printing ther "11/5" which it should -- I'll take a look see
why not -- maybe when releasing the code I deleted a printf() which I took
for a debugging line or something.

I've entered this bug in bugzilla; please could people try to get in the
habit of doing the same as well when they report bugs to this list?  We've
now made it even easier than before by setting up the DNS address:

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/

Thanks,

C


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to