Actually, I've been thinking strongly about tracking the total score from that
recipient, and the number of messages seen, then regressing the score for a new
message toward the mean.  ie:

message9 comes in from userA
score message9 against patterns, etc.
retrieve total of scores for message1..message8 from userA

final score for message9 = (score + (total/8)) / 2

The constant 8 above is becuase there had been 8 message before.  The 2 is arb
itrary, and that constant might change (along with switching to a more complex
form of the equation).  2 is probably about right though.

The effect of this is that a particular message's score is 50% taken from the
message itself, and 50% taken from the profile of that sender.  So the list
becomes an auto-blacklist as well as auto-whitelist (though of course spammers
seldom send from the same address twice).  Messages which are *really* spammy
but appear to come froma  legitimate source are not necessarily cleared.  This
could be useful for both people forging you yourself as sender (as Joey pointed
out), or for people spamming while sending from "famous" people like popular
list-submitters.

C

Duncan Findlay wrote:

> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:50:38 -0500
> From: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Forged from header and autowhitelist
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 10:38:52PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It's a problem if spammers can avoid spamassassin by forging mail from
> > people I've got autowhitelisted, like ... me.
> >
>
> Maybe you shouldn't have been talking to yourself in the first place :-)
>
> I do wonder about the default score for auto-whitelisting, it seems a bit
> high.  I think -10 would work fine: that would give my auto-whitelisted
> people up to a threshhold of 15, which is a REALLY spammy message with the
> new scores.
>
> This would be more likely to combat cases like Joey's problem.
>
>


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to