> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Jan 24, Shane Williams wrote: > > > So, with all the traffic over the last 48 hours, I'm feeling a bit > > confused. It seems clear that the official 2.0 release had a few > > bugs. Are fixes to those bugs being rolled into the 2.0 > code, or only > > being applied to the 2.1 code? > > Ditto; I was just about to finally upgrade from my current, very > stable late-1.4 code to 2.0 when the bug reports started coming > out. I'm using SA/Razor in production, and I need this to be a fairly > bombproof upgrade. I'd like to get the whitelist capablity, but there > have been so many other issues that I've held off waiting for things > to settle out. > > For those of us who prefer a stable version, rather than the current > bleeding edge code, what is the correct course of action- and when > should we act?
This is a tough call. I'm using SA from CVS just a while before 2.0 was released and it's running fine (processed 20,000 emails with it today alone). But I may have missed a few of the late-introduced bugs. Also our setup isn't the same as anyone elses - we just use SA as a class, not as an application. So I'll punt to JM. Matt. (who has to give a talk about our anti-spam technology to our sales conference tomorrow. Yeek!) ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
