Hi all, On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:02:41AM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > | * Ged Haywood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > | > I'd suggest a two digit minor version number, for example 2.01.2023 > | > rather than 2.1.2023, because then we don't have the stupidity of > | > version 2.2.2023 being older than 2.14.4096 (like Apache does it:). > | > | Um, 2.2.* is older than 2.14.* > > Good catch! I think he meant it the other way : > 2.10 is older than 2.9 He meant what he said. 73, Ged. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
