On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Greg Ward wrote:

> [my idea]
> > I can envision a couple of tests of "To" headers that might catch a bit
> > more spam.  Examples:
> >
> >   * mail to any address not recognized as mine should earn 0.5 - 1.0
> >     points; this could be improved by having a "recipient whitelist"
> >     where you put known recipients, including mailing lists you're o
>
> [Charlie Watts reacts]
> > How does spamassassin know your address? This is a nice test, but how do
> > you get your addresses into spamassassin?
>
> Well, I've whipped up a very ad-hoc version already:
>
>   header TO_UNKNOWN To !~ /gward|greg/
>   describe TO_UNKNOWN To: header points to someone else
>   score TO_UNKNOWN 0.8
>
> Obviously this will only work for me, and it will unfairly malign most
> mailing list messages.  It's a start, though.

I think most folks like this idea - do you have ideas how to scale this to
the ISP level?

One thing I've been brainstorming is to pass the recipient address to
spamc/spamassassin from procmail/maildrop. It would be far from perfect,
but with a low score I think it might be very useful.

-- 
Charlie Watts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frontier Internet, Inc.
http://www.frontier.net/


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to