On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Greg Ward wrote: > On 23 January 2002, Craig Hughes said: > > Nothing unusual here. spamassassin -t will always append that footer, > > just to let you know in detail which tests matched. spamassassin -P > > will not do anything except add the X-Spam-Status: No line. > > Ahh, I see. I was confused because I ran spamassasin -t on a maildir > full of recent spam (and my complaints about it) to evaluate SA on > multiple messages. Turns out I wasn't seeing the footer because mutt > was obeying either the "Content-length" or "Lines" header. (These might > have been added by mutt in the first place; this maildir started life as > an mbox, and I just converted it so I could access one message at a time > more easily.) > > Perhaps SpamAssassin should munge the Content-Length and/or Lines > headers when it adds a header or footer?
Modifying headers is safe; I still think that modifying the body of a message is bad. This is just another reason why ... -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
