On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Donald Greer wrote: > Well, I found a work-around. I don't know that it's the best way to > fix it, but... > If anyone wants to tell me if this is not an acceptable solution > (e.g. it'll reject valid headers or accept invalid headers) please let > me know. > Otherwise, it seams to work, so onward and upward! > Here's the patch: <snip>
That's ... odd. When you feed sample-spam.txt or sample-nonspam.txt through spamassassin or spamc on the command line, do you have this problem? Or does it only happen via your mail system? You obliquely mentioned seive - how are you calling spamc? -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
