Craig Hughes said:
> Well, some of the ISO-8859-* should be "far away", shouldn't they? > Weren't we treating some russian character set as "far away" not too > long ago? How is say, arabic (8859-6) "closer" than russian? Or how is > 8859-5 (cyrillic) not russian? er, (waves hands) ;) I dunno. To tell the truth, I think the locales test isn't working as well as it should; perhaps it should be broken down into a "message is in random foreign charset" and a "message is in big5 in particular" test, since the main body of spam it needs to catch seems to be in the latter. (I haven't seen a koi8-r or tis620 spam yet, as far as I know). --j. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
