I've been trying out spamassassin ("spamassassin -P") for a few days
now. It is really cool, but I managed to nearly kill my system when
my filter caused an infinite loop of error messages (I had like 8 or
so spamassassin processes running simultaneously). I looked at the
docs for spamc/spamd and started spamd running. I can "scan" a
message using spamc, but many messages that "spamassassin -P" catches
easily, spamc reports as flagging no tests. For example, here's the
result from one such message
$ cat 1011540635.15043.dman.ddts.net | spamc | egrep "X-Spam|SPAM:"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests=
$ cat 1011540635.15043.dman.ddts.net | spamassassin -P | egrep "X-Spam|SPAM:"
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=24 required=5 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,PLING,HTML_WITH_
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: Content analysis details: (24.3 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: Hit! (1.2 points) From: does not include a real name
SPAM: Hit! (0.8 points) Subject has an exclamation mark
SPAM: Hit! (1.2 points) BODY: HTML mail with non-white background
SPAM: Hit! (3.8 points) BODY: /to (?:be removed|be deleted|no longer receive
th(?:is|ese) messages?) (?:from|send|reply|[e-]*mail)/i
SPAM: Hit! (2.7 points) BODY: URL of page called "remove"
SPAM: Hit! (2.5 points) BODY: Link to a URL containing "remove"
SPAM: Hit! (3.3 points) BODY: /click here.{0,100}<\/a>/is
SPAM: Hit! (2 points) BODY: Image tag with an ID code to identify you
SPAM: Hit! (3 points) Listed in Razor, see http://razor.sourceforge.net/
SPAM: Hit! (1.8 points) From and To the same address
SPAM: Hit! (2 points) Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found relay 230.136.76.211.relays.osirusoft.com.]
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
My syslog has this relevant info in it :
Jan 20 13:28:13 dman spamd[11306]: connection from dman.ddts.net [127.0.0.1 ] at port
35591
Jan 20 13:28:13 dman spamd[15800]: processed successfully for dman:1000 in 0 seconds.
What is wrong with spamc/spamd? I've tried spamd both with and
without the "-d" option and spamc with no options.
BTW, the performance of 'spamc' does match the claims :
real 0m0.055s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
compared to
real 0m1.440s
user 0m0.720s
sys 0m0.080s
TIA!
-D
--
Commit to the Lord whatever you do,
and your plans will succeed.
Proverbs 16:3
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
