On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
> Well, send it on as full-text-with-headers attachments to me and
> I'll add it to the data set. That will definitely help.
Here it is. Glad to be able to help, in however small a way!
> Unfortunately the foreign-charset test really _requires_ user tweaking. I
> haven't thought of a decent way to avoid this... :(
I understand the problem. I'll give it some thought when I'm trawling
through the mails flagged as spam. Although at the moment the spam
seems to have gone a little more quiet than usual!
73,
Ged.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 15 17:28:05 2002
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 14 21:22:49 2002
Received: from localhost (chaz.ru [195.42.137.33])
by www2.jubileegroup.co.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g0ELMOE32280
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:22:27 GMT
Received: (qmail 10286 invoked by uid 100); 14 Jan 2002 21:22:22 -0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: mod_accel English documentation
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201141332030.93131-100000@is>
Organization: e-labs
Date: 15 Jan 2002 00:22:22 +0300
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 33
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5 required=5 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,CHARSET_FARAWAY
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future, using
SPAM: the built-in mail filtering support in your mail reader.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.2 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: Hit! (1.2 points) From: does not include a real name
SPAM: Hit! (4 points) Character set indicates a foreign language
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi guys!
> The main reason is that Apache can handle non-proxied content while
> Squid and Oops can proxy only.
I inserted this explanation to doc.
> +Moreover, when mod_proxy is configured for
> +acceleration mode it often makes the mistake of allowing standard
> +proxying that opens a new public proxy-server.</p>
>
> I want to say that NOT mod_proxy makes mistake but person who configured
> it (he simple sets 'ProxyRequests on' although it is not needed for
> ProxyPass).
Yes. I thought so. Isn't my translation right?
> +and the <code>accel_st</code> flag is set to <code>PASS</code>.
> +[META: is 'flag' what you mean? A flag is usually a boolean. -- Ged.]
>
> Danil, it's not flag it's Apache note.
Are all 'заметки' Apache notes? I thought they are private markers
(variables) of mod_accel.
--
dapi
