In article <[email protected]>, Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Module Name: src >Committed By: rin >Date: Fri Sep 26 10:41:00 UTC 2025 > >Modified Files: > src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/lib: Makefile.sanitizer > >Log Message: >gcc.old: vax: G/C unnecessary -O1 hacks for sanitizer > >Sanitizers successfully build, and all ATF cases for ubsan pass >without these hacks for vax. > > >To generate a diff of this commit: >cvs rdiff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/lib/Makefile.sanitizer > >Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the >copyright notices on the relevant files. > > >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Modified files: > >Index: src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/lib/Makefile.sanitizer >diff -u src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/lib/Makefile.sanitizer:1.8 >src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/lib/Makefile.sanitizer:1.9 >--- src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/lib/Makefile.sanitizer:1.8 Sun Sep 7 >04:11:47 2025 >+++ src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/lib/Makefile.sanitizer Fri Sep 26 10:41:00 2025 >@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >-# $NetBSD: Makefile.sanitizer,v 1.8 2025/09/07 04:11:47 mrg Exp $ >+# $NetBSD: Makefile.sanitizer,v 1.9 2025/09/26 10:41:00 rin Exp $ > > SANITIZER=${GCCDIST}/libsanitizer > .PATH: ${SANITIZER}/interception ${SANITIZER}/sanitizer_common >@@ -104,22 +104,3 @@ COPTS.ubsan_handlers_cxx.cpp+=-Wno-error > > # Can't profile without it > #-fomit-frame-pointer >- >-.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "vax" >-COPTS.sanitizer_allocator.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_common.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_common_libcdep.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_coverage_libcdep.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_coverage_mapping_libcdep.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_deadlock_detector1.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_mac.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_netbsd.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_posix.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_printf.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_procmaps_common.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_stackdepot.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.sanitizer_symbolizer_report.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.ubsan_diag.cc += -O1 >-COPTS.ubsan_init.cc += -O1 >-.endif
Aren't those still needed, because presumably when you are building gcc.old, you end up with a gcc that needs them? christos
