Module Name: src
Committed By: andvar
Date: Mon Sep 2 18:19:14 UTC 2024
Modified Files:
src/sys/net: slcompress.c
src/usr.bin/compress/doc: NOTES
Log Message:
s/compess/compress/
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.41 -r1.42 src/sys/net/slcompress.c
cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 src/usr.bin/compress/doc/NOTES
Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.
Modified files:
Index: src/sys/net/slcompress.c
diff -u src/sys/net/slcompress.c:1.41 src/sys/net/slcompress.c:1.42
--- src/sys/net/slcompress.c:1.41 Sat Apr 6 08:38:23 2019
+++ src/sys/net/slcompress.c Mon Sep 2 18:19:14 2024
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $NetBSD: slcompress.c,v 1.41 2019/04/06 08:38:23 msaitoh Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: slcompress.c,v 1.42 2024/09/02 18:19:14 andvar Exp $ */
/* Id: slcompress.c,v 1.3 1996/05/24 07:04:47 paulus Exp */
/*
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
*/
/*
- * Routines to compress and uncompess tcp packets (for transmission
+ * Routines to compress and uncompress tcp packets (for transmission
* over low speed serial lines.
*
* Van Jacobson (v...@helios.ee.lbl.gov), Dec 31, 1989:
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
-__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: slcompress.c,v 1.41 2019/04/06 08:38:23 msaitoh Exp $");
+__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: slcompress.c,v 1.42 2024/09/02 18:19:14 andvar Exp $");
#ifdef _KERNEL_OPT
#include "opt_inet.h"
Index: src/usr.bin/compress/doc/NOTES
diff -u src/usr.bin/compress/doc/NOTES:1.2 src/usr.bin/compress/doc/NOTES:1.3
--- src/usr.bin/compress/doc/NOTES:1.2 Mon Mar 13 23:22:50 2000
+++ src/usr.bin/compress/doc/NOTES Mon Sep 2 18:19:14 2024
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ as I recall.)
now where is telebit with the compress firmware? in a limbo
netherworld, probably, with sperry still welcoming outfits
to sign patent licenses, a common tactic to bring other small fry
- into the fold. the guy who crammed 12-bit compess into the modem
+ into the fold. the guy who crammed 12-bit compress into the modem
there left. also what is transpiring with 'compress' and sys 5 rel 4?
beats me, but if sperry got a hold of them on these issues,
at&t would likely re-implement another algorithm if they
