Date:        Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:55:15 +0300
    From:        Valery Ushakov <u...@stderr.spb.ru>
    Message-ID:  <Yuf3YwQfqiTat/d...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>

  | The test uses __clone(), not clone() and a followup fix made __clone()
  | visible under plain _NETBSD_SOURCE again - which is the right thing,
  | IMO.  So this change is not necessary (the test only uses __clone()).

Yes, I saw, but the test really should be using clone() - that"s
the thing which needs to work (for those odd apps which use it).

kre

Reply via email to