In article <20200616075907.ecafcf...@cvs.netbsd.org>, Martin Husemann <source-changes-d@NetBSD.org> wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Module Name: src >Committed By: martin >Date: Tue Jun 16 07:59:07 UTC 2020 > >Modified Files: > src/tests/lib/libarchive: t_libarchive.sh > >Log Message: >PR kern/55272: skip this test on uniprocessor machines, it is too dangerous >and can kill the host kernel if a userland watchdog is running
So we are saying that it is ok for process running with regular priority, to be able to starve another process at the same priority from getting any runtime for 21 seconds in a uniprocessor kernel, and this does not indicate any problem with the scheduler implementation? This would mean that for a HZ=100 kernel in 2100 rescheduling opportunities, the watchdog thread was never selected to run? christos
