On 26.03.2020 17:03, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 26.03.2020 16:17, Greg Troxel wrote: >> I don't think we can go from "upstream is unwilling to do X" >> to "impose pain on NetBSD" by making "divergence bad" be the >> highest-weighted concern. We have to say "what is the minimally >> painful way to cope". > > I agree here that we want to get /tmp by default, but in real life we > lost these local modifications anyway. None of the pkgsrc packages ships > with this and upstream GCC knows better.. so I keep trying to find a > creative way to get it done right. > > Patching every libiberty copy is almost not doable (we don't patch any > user of it in pkgsrc). > > If I will fail to convince GCC to add a way to tune this tmpdir, we will > live with these libiberty patches in src. > > If GCC will be unconvinced, I don't plan to remove this local modification. > > On 26.03.2020 16:56, Taylor R Campbell wrote: >> We don't need to set TMPDIR=/tmp anywhere because that's already what >> correct programs use by default (for example, via _PATH_TMP). > > Good idea. I will try to reuse _PATH_TMP and submit upstream. >
OK, I have got another idea how to address it. Thank you for the feedback.
