Martin Husemann wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 01:45:08PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > Thanks! I will go for __NO_LEAKS ifdef. > > But it is not a good idea to clutter perfectly fine sources with such > #ifdefs and unused/untested/likely broken code (even if it does not affect > the default binaries). I support __NO_LEAKS idea because it documents the fact that there are indended leaks. -- Alex
