On December 28, 2018 9:54:11 PM GMT+05:30, John Nemeth <jnem...@cue.bc.ca> wrote: >On Dec 28, 7:36pm, "Cherry G.Mathew" wrote: >} Maxime Villard <m...@m00nbsd.net> writes: >} > Le 28/12/2018 �� 14:57, Cherry G.Mathew a ��crit : >} >> Maxime Villard <m...@m00nbsd.net> writes: >} >>>> Introduce a weak alias method of exporting different >implementations >} >>>> of the same API. >} >>> >} >>> Please revert or fix this change. >} >> >} >> I'm not sure what the fix is - do you have a suggestion ? >} > >} > either re-apply it without using weak symbols, or change the >modloader >} > to accept weak symbols >} >} I don't like the imperative in your tone. NVMM is the user of >modloader, >} not PVHVM. So if you feel like your usecase needs fixing, I'd say >it's >} your problem - or don't use modules, but see below. > > I suspect there's a language issue here due to people using >English as a second language. However, I don't see an imperative >(command) here. You asked for suggestions on how to fix a problem. >He answered your question with a couple of suggestions. That's >all. > > Also, I would argue that the kernel uses modloader, not the >module. In any event, as mentioned, it is your change that broke >things... > >}-- End of excerpt from "Cherry G.Mathew"
On second reading, I take that back. Replied too hastily, and maxv has kindly offered to work around the problem temporarily. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
