On 13/12/2018 04:00, Simon Burge wrote: > While a bit wordier, I think that accurately describes the behaviour. > LGTM.
Thanks. I had one other thought which I haven't investigated yet but did we change behaviour intentionally? My committed change complements the description of -c "Repeat the display count times. The first display is for the time since a reboot and each subsequent report is for the time period since the last display. If no wait interval is specified, the default is 1 second." The other thing was that prior to my commit, I was testing things on an i7 and there the run queue doesn't change. When you followed up post commit, I checked on a uniprocessor system & there the run queue does register. I want to explore that too and document further (heads up) aside from this scenario with the first line. Sevan
