On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:11:39PM +0000, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:49:21AM +0000, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Can we use aprint_debug instead?
It is not even usefull for general debugging IMHO.
Martin
I like the idea of removing the messages entirely. The code was hard to
read when I had to do it, and I didn't find those messages helpful.
I meant: I like the way Simon changed it - it will not show up unless
you are explicitly debugging exec stuff.
Well, it could remain conditional, and in addition use aprint_debug()
instead of printf(). So even if you've compiled it in, you don't see
anything unless you also boot with debug (ie, boot -x).
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
