In article <0a6e53d7-4f6e-6e25-cd61-2342e1c4e...@gmx.com>, Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 06.12.2016 19:59, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By: christos >> Date: Tue Dec 6 18:59:00 UTC 2016 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/tests/kernel: t_ptrace_wait.c >> >> Log Message: >> switch to using fork so we can see the child output. >> > >atf_utils_fork() still works however... it outputs to .txt files, one >file is saved from stdout and the other from stderr.
No, because it overwrites files on multiuple forks and you lose the order of printing. >Maybe we should rework atf_utils_fork() in ATF to just work like >fork(2), with setup for buffering and exit on failure? Well, I was thinking of enhancing it but then I decided against it. (too much work for little benefit). christos
