On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:44:10PM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> 
> > On 28 Oct 2016, at 22:38, Jaromir Dolecek <jdole...@netbsd.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Module Name:        src
> > Committed By:       jdolecek
> > Date:               Fri Oct 28 20:38:12 UTC 2016
> > 
> > Modified Files:
> >     src/sys/kern: vfs_wapbl.c
> >     src/sys/sys: wapbl.h
> >     src/sys/ufs/ffs: ffs_alloc.c ffs_inode.c ffs_snapshot.c
> >     src/sys/ufs/ufs: ufs_extern.h ufs_inode.c ufs_rename.c ufs_vnops.c
> >         ufs_wapbl.h
> > 
> > Log Message:
> > reorganize ffs_truncate()/ffs_indirtrunc() to be able to partially
> > succeed; change wapbl_register_deallocation() to return EAGAIN
> > rather than panic when code hits the limit
> > 
> > callers changed to either loop calling ffs_truncate() using new
> > utility ufs_truncate_retry() if their semantics requires it, or
> > just ignore the failure; remove ufs_wapbl_truncate()
> > 
> > this fixes possible user-triggerable panic during truncate, and
> > resolves WAPBL performance issue with truncates of large files
> > 
> > PR kern/47146 and kern/49175
> 
> - This change results in "panic: ffs_blkfree_common: freeing free block"
>   if I put a file system under stress (*1).
> 
> - I suppose not zeroing the blocks to be freed before freeing them
>   makes the life of fsck harder.
> 
> - Running "brelse(bp, BC_INVAL)" doesn't look OK.
> 
> Please fix or revert soon.

For easier testing, I've imported fsx as pkgsrc/filesystems/fsx.

Cheers,
 Thomas

Reply via email to